Other Publications

Education Columns

Residents as Partners in the Creation, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Regional CME Course: An Innovative Way to Foster Residents’ Academic Development

Sukhjeet Kamboj, MD, Abdul Waheed, MD, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey PA, and WellSpan Good Samaritan Hospital Family Medicine Residency Program, Lebanon PA; Michael Malone, MD, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey PA, and Tidelands Health MUSC Family Medicine Residency Program; Tara Kennedy, MD, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey PA; Ayesha Abid, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey PA, and Department of Family Medicine, West Virginia University Potomac Valley Hospital, Keyser, WV

Background
Traditionally, North American graduate medical education—in both the clinic and the classroom—emphasizes the acquisition of patient care skills. For those who opt for careers in academic medicine, teaching skills are acquired via faculty development fellowships or through “on the job learning.” However, residents are involved on a daily basis in teaching their fellow residents, medical students, and patients.1 As a result, there is a growing emphasis on teaching residents to be good educators, particularly as related competency-based curricula are being rolled out.2 Although there is an increasing trend toward having curricula for residents as teachers, there is a paucity of data on opportunities for residents to present at regional CME courses or to direct these courses in parallel with faculty.3

Intervention/Preparation and Methodology
The Penn State University Department of Family and Community Medicine developed a hands-on approach to teaching residents to teach and serve on the panel of course directors of a CME course. In 2012, a regional CME event was planned by several faculty members who were in the early stages of their academic family medicine careers. The conference was designed to serve as a junior faculty development tool, and provided opportunities for junior faculty to improve their speaking and presentation skills. It also allowed junior faculty to take the lead in directing and designing the course.4,5 Opportunities for collaboration were extended to residents in two phases. For the first 2 years, residents participated as speakers at the course. Subsequently, residents with an interest in academia were given the opportunity to partner with junior faculty as course codirectors.

Although the dominant mode was experiential learning, residents were also provided with mentorship and verbal and written guidance, including the following:

  • Summary guide for the creation of course curriculum using David Kern’s model.6
  • Short guide for preparation regarding CME accreditation, marketing and promotion.
  • A list of literature search resources, including research help from the College of Medicine librarian.
  • Best practices guidelines for the creation of PowerPoint presentations.
  • The opportunity to present at practice sessions, and give and receive feedback. 

Impact
Resident CME Speakers
Twelve residents have presented over the course of the past 3 years, indicating an increasing number of opportunities for residents. The primary care practitioner audience scored resident speakers comparably to faculty presenting at the same conference.

Resident Course Codirectors
Three residents have served as course codirectors in the past 3 years, indicating successful and sustainable provision of such opportunities for family medicine residents. Every resident was able to report Kern’s six steps after going through 1 year of hands-on participation in the creation, implementation, and evaluation of the regional CME course. All three of these residents are now in academic careers.

Conclusion
Participation in a regional CME course has effectively served as a faculty development tool for residents. Since the expansion of the role of the residents in the course, three residents have participated as speakers each year, and one resident per year has participated as course codirector.

Although this regional CME activity has increased opportunities for interested residents to enhance their teaching skills, this platform does not have the capacity to accommodate all residents in its current form. Future efforts will be directed toward increasing the number of resident presenters or, possibly to dedicating a whole conference to resident speakers. One potential barrier to such a conference would be maintaining its commercial potential to attract primary care practitioners as an audience.

The residents who codirected the course informally expressed interest in learning the principles of curriculum development in a setting outside of the CME course. In the future, we are planning to include regular didactic teaching focused on this topic and to use this CME course to create an area of concentration in academic family medicine within our residency program.

References

  1. Bing-You RG, Sproul MS. Medical students’ perceptions of themselves and residents as teachers. Med Teach. 1992;14(2-3):133-138. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599209079479
  2. Iobst WF, Sherbino J, Cate OT, et al. Competency-based medical education in postgraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):651-656. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.500709
  3. Bree KK, Whicker SA, Fromme HB, Paik S, Greenberg L. Residents-as-teachers publications: what can programs learn from the literature when starting a new or refining an established curriculum? J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(2):237-248. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-13-00308.1
  4. Waheed A, Kamboj S, et al. Regional continuing medical education (CME) conference as junior faculty development tool: reflections of participating junior faculty. Poster presented at Annual Ed Venture Penn State Woodward Office of Excellence in Health Professions Education; Hershey, PA. April 2017.
  5. Malone M, Waheed A, Pujalte G, Baker J, Kaushi N. Creation of primary care continuing medical education (CME) conference designed as a resident and junior faculty development tool. STFM Education Column. July 2015. http://www.stfm.org/NewsJournals/EducationColumns/July2015EducationColumn. Accessed August 13, 2018.
  6. Kern D, Thomas PA, Hughes M. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six Step Approach. 2nd Edition. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press 2009.

Contact Us

11400 Tomahawk Creek Parkway

Leawood, KS 66211

(800) 274-7928

stfmoffice@stfm.org 

 

 

Ask a Question
AI Chatbot Tips

Tips for Using STFM's AI Assistant

STFM's AI Assistant is designed to help you find information and answers about Family Medicine education. While it's a powerful tool, getting the best results depends on how you phrase your questions. Here's how to make the most of your interactions:

1. Avoid Ambiguous Language

Be Clear and Specific: Use precise terms and avoid vague words like "it" or "that" without clear references.

Example:

Instead of: "Can you help me with that?"
Try: "Can you help me update our Family Medicine clerkship curriculum?"
Why this is important: Ambiguous language can confuse the AI, leading to irrelevant or unclear responses. Clear references help the chatbot understand exactly what you're asking.

2. Use Specific Terms

Identify the Subject Clearly: Clearly state the subject or area you need information about.

Example:

Instead of: "What resources does STFM provide?"
Try: "I'm a new program coordinator for a Family Medicine clerkship. What STFM resources are available to help me design or update clerkship curricula?"
Why this is better: Providing details about your role ("program coordinator") and your goal ("design or update clerkship curricula") gives the chatbot enough context to offer more targeted information.

3. Don't Assume the AI Knows Everything

Provide Necessary Details:The STFM AI Assistant has been trained on STFM's business and resources. The AI can only use the information you provide or that it has been trained on.

Example:

Instead of: "How can I improve my program?"
Try: "As a program coordinator for a Family Medicine clerkship, what resources does STFM provide to help me improve student engagement and learning outcomes?"
Why this is important: Including relevant details helps the AI understand your specific situation, leading to more accurate and useful responses.

4. Reset if You Change Topics

Clear Chat History When Switching Topics:

If you move to a completely new topic and the chatbot doesn't recognize the change, click the Clear Chat History button and restate your question.
Note: Clearing your chat history removes all previous context from the chatbot's memory.
Why this is important: Resetting ensures the AI does not carry over irrelevant information, which could lead to confusion or inaccurate answers.

5. Provide Enough Context

Include Background Information: The more context you provide, the better the chatbot can understand and respond to your question.

Example:

Instead of: "What are the best practices?"
Try: "In the context of Family Medicine education, what are the best practices for integrating clinical simulations into the curriculum?"
Why this is important: Specific goals, constraints, or preferences allow the AI to tailor its responses to your unique needs.

6. Ask One Question at a Time

Break Down Complex Queries: If you have multiple questions, ask them separately.

Example:

Instead of: "What are the requirements for faculty development, how do I register for conferences, and what grants are available?"
Try: Start with "What are the faculty development requirements for Family Medicine educators?" Then follow up with your other questions after receiving the response.
Why this is important: This approach ensures each question gets full attention and a complete answer.

Examples of Good vs. Bad Prompts

Bad Prompt

"What type of membership is best for me?"

Why it's bad: The AI Chat Assistant has no information about your background or needs.

Good Prompt

"I'm the chair of the Department of Family Medicine at a major university, and I plan to retire next year. I'd like to stay involved with Family Medicine education. What type of membership is best for me?"

Why it's good: The AI Chat Assistant knows your role, your future plans, and your interest in staying involved, enabling it to provide more relevant advice.

Double Check Important Information

While the AI Chat Assistant is a helpful tool, it can still produce inaccurate or incomplete responses. Always verify critical information with reliable sources or colleagues before taking action.

Technical Limitations

The Chat Assistant:

  • Cannot access external websites or open links
  • Cannot process or view images
  • Cannot make changes to STFM systems or process transactions
  • Cannot access real-time information (like your STFM Member Profile information)

STFM AI Assistant
Disclaimer: The STFM Assistant can make mistakes. Check important information.